Week Six: BioTech + Art
This week's topics covered the merging of
biotechnology and creative ability, especially emphasizing how our advancements
have allowed for questionable art techniques. Personally, this week's topic
made me quite uncomfortable.
I'm a strong believer that life itself is
indeed a valid medium, much like the implanted ear on Stelarc's arm. Each
individual person has every right to perform what they will on their own body,
and I find it to be a reasonable form of expression, no different from
tattoos.
However, using transgenics, mutilation,
mutation, recombinance, and selective breeding as artistic techniques seems
akin to "playing god." I see the importance of these techniques when
dealing with dangerous diseases or providing enough food to whole populations
--uses that promote life-- but find problem when these tools are used either
with no important purpose or to endanger creatures. In one specific example,
Alba was the bunny that was genetically engineered to fluorescently glow. A
recent article shows that she died at just 2 1/2 years of age, which is just
half of the normal lab-rabbit life span and less than a quarter of a normal pet
rabbit in captivity.
I think that there should be more standards
for how animals and even bacteria are used in the form of art, if at all. I
like to think I'm relatively liberal in my standings, but knowing that life
forms of any type are being used for human entertainment seems cruel. While I
don't think there should be limits on human expression, I sincerely mean I
don't think there should be any on human expression. But, keep
it contained. Mutilation of your own body is fine, but please leave rabbits
with their white fur. Mutations for the sake of saving people are lovely, but
mutating bacteria to send into space is unnecessary. Even when dealing only
with normal mediums, paint should be disposed of properly and chemicals used
sparingly.
Mr. Joe Davis, the artist who worked to send bacteria containing the human genome into space. |
We have but one earth to create art on, and we
shouldn't disrespect it in our process of doing so.
Sources:
"Man implants ear in his arm so
the world can eavesdrop on his life." CNet.com. Leslie Katz, 14
August 2015. Web. 13 May. 2017.
"RIP:
Alba, the Glowing Bunny." Wired.com. Kristin Philipkoski,
12 August 2002. Web. 13 May. 2017.
Vesna,
Victoria. Bioart Pt. 1 https://cole2.uconline.edu/courses/684222/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=11226162
Vesna,
Victoria. Bioart Pt. 3
https://cole2.uconline.edu/courses/684222/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=11226162
Vesna,
Victoria. Bioart Pt. 4 https://cole2.uconline.edu/courses/684222/pages/unit-6-view?module_item_id=11226162
Pictures:
Joseph
Caputo. Digital Image. “Creating art with genes and bacteria.” Elsevier.com. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/creating-art-with-genes-and-bacteria
Eduardo
Kac. Digital Image. “GFP Bunny.” Ekac.org. http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html
Nina Sellars.
Digital Image. “Man implants ear in his arm so the world can eavesdrop on his
life.” https://www.cnet.com/news/man-implants-ear-in-his-arm-so-the-world-can-eavesdrop-on-his-life/
Hello I strongly agree with you on the way we should treat animals and our environment when combining biotech and art. To be honest I think we are never completely free in terms of human expression, at least we shouldn't be, there are just factors like these that we always need to consider.
ReplyDelete